برچسب: Cabinet

  • The Caretakers of The Tool Cabinet and Workbench of Henry O. Studley.

    The Caretakers of The Tool Cabinet and Workbench of Henry O. Studley.


    The following is excerpted from “Virtuoso: The Tool Cabinet and Workbench of Henry O. Studley,” by Donald C. Williams, with photographs by Narayan Nayar.

    In a space of just 10” x 39” x 19-1/2”, H.O. Studley managed to arrange – with perfection – more than 250 of his tools into a dovetailed mahogany cabinet that has captivated tens of thousands of woodworkers since it was first unveiled in 1988 on the back cover of Fine Woodworking with a single shocking photograph.

    After a brief stay at the Smithsonian, the cabinet was sold to a private collector and hadn’t been seen by the public for well over a decade. Studley’s workbench has never been on public view.

    For four years, Donald Williams and a team of supporting characters researched, documented and photographed both the cabinet and Studley’s equally amazing workbench to create “Virtuoso: The Tool Cabinet and Workbench of Henry O. Studley.

    This book is an in-depth examination of one of the most beautiful woodworking tool chests ever constructed and presents the first-ever biography of Studley (1838-1925), a piano and organ builder in Quincy, Mass. It features measurements, details and photographs of all the tools in the cabinet. Every swinging frame, hinged panel and nook of this three-dimensional, multi-layered sculpture has been analyzed so you can understand how it folds in on itself like a giant piece of mahogany origami.

    But most of all, you will see the cabinet in a way that only a handful of privileged people ever have. And you will realize that the magazine photograph that electrified the woodworking world in 1988 only scratches the surface of the cabinet’s complete magnificence.


    The generation of Hardwicks who were Studley’s contemporaries included three brothers: Charles Henry Hardwick, Sr., Henry Everett Hardwick and Charles Theodore Hardwick. It was these men with whom Studley bought and sold real estate. Again, according to Hardwick family legend, somewhere along the path of these ventures was a loan from one or more of the Hardwick brothers to Henry O. Studley, a loan that was secured with his tool cabinet as collateral. It is unknown whether the loan was part of a specific real estate transaction or simply part of a larger portfolio of activities.

    This scenario of the tool ensemble being collateral does make sense at some level. We know these basic facts: Studley was deeply engaged in real estate deals, including many with the Hardwick family; he possessed the tool cabinet preceding his retirement about 1919, as proved by the photographic portrait; about that time his wife had recently died after a lingering and debilitating illness; and Studley’s own health began to fail shortly thereafter. It is not a great leap to wonder if any of these events had financial implications, and the conveyance of the tool cabinet and workbench to the Hardwicks was a consequence of that circumstance.

    At first, I arrived at that conclusion because it made sense. However, an examination of the public records surrounding the Stetson and Studley family finances does not support the idea that Studley’s disposal of the tool cabinet and workbench was financially driven. His wife was from a wealthy family, and he had become wealthy himself along with her during their long marriage. A Stetson family deposition from 1940 relating to the disposition of some family assets states that [Mrs. Studley] “died without leaving any estate as she was bedridden for six years prior to her death and had used all her savings for expenses.” This deposition, however, does not align with the facts of Abbie’s will and probate, which lists substantial assets.

    Given the probability that Studley’s finances did not force him to relinquish his tool cabinet, an equally plausible possibility, and in fact my own inescapable conclusion, is that it was a simple gift from Studley to Mr. Hardwick as a gesture of friendship and generosity, especially given that Studley was retired from the workshop and that he had presumably prospered through his partnerships with the Hardwicks over many years.

    This Hardwick family Christmas card,
    probably from the 1950s, presents an
    image of the four-story granite manse that
    served as home to several generations of
    the family and was perhaps the starting
    point for Henry Studley’s career as a
    skilled craftsman. (Image courtesy of
    Peter Hardwick)

    There is of course at this point no way to know the circumstances of the transaction and transfer; there is no known documentary evidence for the change in ownership. Still, it makes for some fascinating contemplation to consider the series of events at the end of Studley’s life that led him to part with this treasure, an inspired product of his own genius and hands.

    Whatever the cause, the responsibility for custody and care of the tool cabinet and workbench now rested with the Hardwicks. Were it not for this caprice, the Hardwicks might be best known for their granite quarry and a scandalous murder that occurred there on July 29, 1910. In this sensational crime, Henry E. Hardwick and Mrs. Marianna Restelli, among others, were killed by her son, a quarryman/stone cutter named Luigi (Louis) Restelli. The relationship between Mr. Hardwick and Mrs. Restelli is unknown, and their simultaneous murder may be entirely coincidental.

    Luigi Restelli was known to associate with an anarchist cell in Quincy, and a contemporaneous account in The New York Times suggests that the Quincy cell was under instructions from anarchist headquarters in Barre, Vt., to “kill rich people.” Numerous contemporaneous sources affirm the same account. The consensus for the motive behind the attacks seems to be “Madness” brought on by debt, and Restelli’s body was found in a nearby quarry pit following his suicide.

    Interestingly, those infamous events are the first solid reference for anything dealing even remotely with the provenance of the tool cabinet ensemble. Yet those events have nothing to do directly with Studley or his cabinet, and tell us nothing new about the circumstances of its creation, the particulars by which it changed hands, nor even why it changed hands. But the events of that fateful day did cast the die for the chain of custody of the cabinet to this very day. Again, we do not know precisely when nor why it came into the Hardwicks’ possession, but we know where it went from then on.

    With the murder of Henry Everett Hardwick, his son Charles Henry Hardwick (the first), a bachelor, inherited the family fortune and assets. This fortune eventually included the tool cabinet and workbench.

    The detail of Charles Henry Hardwick’s bachelor status is critical to the story. It meant that on his death the progression of the family properties moved into the lineage of his brother Robert A. Hardwick, then down through Robert’s only son Charles Henry Hardwick II, Peter’s father, and then to Charles Henry “Hank” Hardwick III, Peter’s older brother. Hank was the family heir as the oldest son of his generation, and so inherited everything including the Studley tool cabinet. The final Hardwick steward of the tool cabinet was Charles Henry Hardwick II’s younger son Peter (thus not a primary heir), who owned it from the 1970s into the end of the 1990s.

    Peter’s father, Charles Henry Hardwick II, died tragically and unexpectedly at the age of 44, predeceasing his own father.

    Peter Hardwick’s earliest memories of the tool cabinet were in the 1950s when he was visiting his great-grandfather’s giant stone house in Quincy. The tool chest was displayed in the second-floor hallway next to the law office of his great uncle Charles, the older, bachelor brother of Peter’s grandfather Robert. The tool chest was protected behind a plastic panel. There it remained throughout Peter’s youth, adolescence and early adulthood, and in profound understatement he says, “It was very interesting to a little boy.”

    Peter also recalls the workbench first being used as a table in the “stable-boy’s quarters above the garage” in Quincy and then the base alone used as an elegant dressing table in the mansion without the slab workbench top attached.

    The Family Moves to Maine
    Peter joined the military in the 1960s, went to Vietnam and, “A lot happened [with family activities] during that time.” During Peter’s military service, his grandfather Robert and brother Hank sold the big house in Quincy and moved to property the family owned in Maine. They took everything from the Quincy house to Maine, including the tool cabinet and workbench, plus as much of the fine Studley handiwork from the granite house as they could move, including a number of fireplace surrounds. Two of those wound up in the farmhouse where Peter lives; the remaining examples were installed in grandfather Robert’s nearby house.

    Unfortunately the space inside Peter Hardwick’s house is not conducive to an overall image of this magnificent Studley-made architectural detail. The lower portion is included in Sandor Nagyszalanczy’s original image of the cabinet. The image was edited for clarity and privacy.

    Peter returned from the military and moved to Maine about 1970 where he worked on the family farm. The three men, Peter, Robert and Hank, lived on adjacent family properties in Maine.

    When Peter’s grandfather Robert died in 1976, “Hank,” Peter’s older brother by three years, inherited the family properties and possessions, including the tool chest and workbench. Hank’s interests lay in other directions so the tool cabinet and workbench remained in storage in a family barn. All the while, Peter never forgot the captivating collection he remembered as a boy visiting his great-uncle’s law offices in the family home in Quincy.

    Once the collection passed to the ownership of his brother, Peter urged him to “take care” and preserve the tool cabinet and contents. In the early 1970s Peter offered to purchase the tool cabinet and related accouterments, including the workbench, and as part of the transaction the brothers retained an antiques dealer to appraise it. The dealer pronounced the tool cabinet and its contents as “something special” and appraised it at $500.

    Always (and still) a car buff, Peter owned a pristine 1934 Ford four-door sedan that was dark blue with low original mileage. Fortunately for our story, Hank was very much interested in the car and a deal was struck between thetwo brothers. Peter promptly made the trade and took possession of the tool cabinet and displayed it in his parlor for more than a decade.

    The only place Peter Hardwick had where the tool cabinet could be displayed was inside his unused fireplace surround in the cottage parlor. Appropriately, the surround was some
    of Studley’s handiwork from the Quincy house. (Photo courtesy of Sandor Nagyszalanczy)

    The Fan Frenzy Begins
    In the late 1980s Peter installed a new chimney in his home, and, in doing what guys do on such a momentous occasion, invited a friend over to show off his newly completed project. This friend, an insurance agent, saw the tool cabinet, recognized its special-ness and encouraged Peter to insure it. This event, Peter said, “Opened a can of worms!”

    Peter tried to figure out exactly what it was that he had and how much to insure it for, and so he turned to Fine Woodworking, the Smithsonian and an antiques appraiser for answers. At Fine Woodworking magazine, Senior Editor Sandor Nagyszalanczy took the call and carries the memories vividly.

    In early 1988, Nagyszalanczy made arrangements to go visit it during another scouting trip to Maine. When he opened the chest, it was, and I am quoting him, “Jaw dropping to floor!” He set up to take the photographs that eventually entered directly into our collective consciousnesses via the backcover of that magazine.

    At that moment, Peter’s life of stewardship of the tool cabinet changed forever. In an age before e-mail, the result of that single back-cover image – and the ensuing posters – was an onslaught of actual “fan mail” for the tool cabinet that overwhelmed him. He received so much mail that he rented a dedicated post office box just for the unsolicited correspondence being forwarded to him by Fine Woodworking. Peter’s only regret from this period was that he did not save the fan mail.

    The Smithsonian
    One of the correspondents was the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of American History Curator David Shayt. While on vacation, Shayt visited Peter and they struck up a fast friendship based initially on their mutual interest in the tool collection, but it soon evolved to reflect the fact that both men were affable and genuinely good guys.

    At the time, Peter had a dilemma. He owned a family heirloom that was also a monumental piece of Americana, and he was concerned about its security and preservation in a simple Maine farmhouse. Shayt proposed a temporary solution. What if Peter loaned the tool cabinet to the Smithsonian for a 10-year period, during which the Smithsonian would bear all the responsibility for it? Once again, Peter reached an agreement to foster the care and preservation of a genuine national treasure, a theme that has touched him throughout his life.

    While at the Institution the cabinet was conserved and exhaustively documented, and included in a small vignette adjacent to the exhibit “Engines of Change: The American Industrial Revolution 1790-1860,” with several other tool chests and cabinets for various trades. Though the larger exhibit lasted almost 20 years (late 1986 to mid-2006), the Studley tool cabinet was included for perhaps only a third of that time, probably from about 1992-1999. No doubt seen by thousands of woodworkers there, the Internet has numerous accounts of woodworkers who were captivated by it. I spoke recently with one visitor, a woodworker, who recalls it “being displayed a long way back from the glass, and in the dark.”

    During the time of the Smithsonian possession, the collection was photographed and documented, and underwent a thorough cleaning and some conservation treatment, as well as being included in the small exhibit. Meanwhile, the torrent of fan mail kept coming, becoming even more of an avalanche with the issuing of the poster, then a Fine Woodworking article, a second edition of a poster and finally a third. The maelstrom of mail led Peter to reconsider his continued ownership of the collection.

    And it was one of those letters that again changed the course of the Studley tool cabinet’s history.

    Enter Mister Stewart
    Among those letters Peter received in the late 1990s was a polite and understated letter from Mister Stewart that expressed admiration for and interest inthe tool cabinet. After subsequent correspondence and conversations, Peter decided that Mister Stewart was the right person to become the new ownerand caretaker for the treasure.



    Source link

  • 3 undeniable reasons to visit the Wurzburg Residence & the Mirror Cabinet in Germany – Veronica Winters Painting

    3 undeniable reasons to visit the Wurzburg Residence & the Mirror Cabinet in Germany – Veronica Winters Painting


    My husband and I traveled the romantic road in Germany and this palace was a great start. The Würzburg Residence’s exterior is reminiscent of French Chateau architecture and features opulent rooms in Baroque and “Würzburg rococo” styles. It’s a feast for the eyes if you feel inspired by the visual beauty. Constructed in the 18th century, this architectural marvel emerged from the genius of Balthasar Neumann. Unlike many other European palaces, the Würzburg Residence was built in its entirety within one generation.

    #1 A perfect blend of Baroque architecture and Rococo style

    Commissioned by Prince-Bishop Johann Philipp Franz von Schönborn (reigned 1755-1779), the Würzburg Residence is a must-see palace! Its so beautiful and the Mirror Cabinet is one-of-a-kind room that I’ve never seen before. It features exuberant decoration of white stucco, gold leaf, sculpture, color and the reverse glass painting giving the room magical appeal. Nearly demolished during the World War II, it was reconstructed to its former glory of lavish opulence.

    wurzburg palace room-veronica winters art blog

    The court architect, Balthasar Neumann (born in 1687) oversaw the construction project that would span nearly 24 years. Neumann, merged the elements of Baroque and Rococo styles in one palace. Neumann worked with top architects of Germany and France – Lucas von Hildebrandt, Maximilian von Welsch, Robert de Cotte and Germain Boffrand, and many artists under the guidance of Antonio Bossi. Johann Wolfgang van der Auwera from Würzburg and Georg Adam Guthmann were the gifted sculptors and woodcarvers, and Giovanni Battista Tiepolo painted the frescoes in the 18th century.

    wurzburg palace -veronica winters art blog

    What is the difference between Baroque style and Rococo?

    Baroque art is a style of art that originated in Italy in the late 16th century and spread throughout Europe in the 17th and 18th centuries. It’s known for its dramatic, emotional, exuberant impact and exaggerated movement of figures. Baroque artists used a variety of techniques to create their art, including exaggerated movement, high contrast, twisting and turning figures and elements, and rich color palettes. Baroque architecture and art features the opulence and exuberance that contrasts medieval modesty in art.

    Rococo style is a later development of Baroque art that emerged in France in the early 18th century. It’s known for its lightness, elegance, and playfulness. Rococo artists often used soft, pastel colors, curved lines, and elaborate ornamentation in their works similar to the Baroque art.

    This table summarizes some of the key differences between Baroque art and Rococo style:

    Characteristic Baroque art Rococo style
    Time period 17th and 18th centuries 18th century
    Origin Italy France
    Overall style Dramatic, emotional, and grandiose Light, elegant, and playful
    Subject matter Often religious, but also mythological and historical Often secular, depicting scenes of everyday life and leisure
    Color palette Rich and vibrant Soft and pastel
    Lines and shapes Bold and angular Curved and delicate
    Ornamentation Elaborate and ornate More restrained and elegant

    Some examples of Baroque art include:

    • The Rape of the Sabines by Peter Paul Rubens
    • The Ecstasy of Saint Teresa by Gian Lorenzo Bernini
    • The Palace of Versailles in France
    • The Trevi Fountain in Rome

    Some examples of Rococo style include:

    • The Swing by Jean-Honoré Fragonard
    • The Pilgrimage to Cythera by Antoine Watteau
    • The Amalienburg in Munich
    • The Schönbrunn Palace in Vienna

    #2 The beauty of reverse glass painting at the Mirror Cabinet

    wurzburg palace-mirror cabinet-veronica winters art blog
    The Mirror cabinet at the Würzburg Residence is a stunning room of art I haven’t seen anywhere else in Europe.

    The recreation of the Mirror Cabinet

    If you walk through the rooms, you’ll see pictures taken after the WWII showing the ruins of the city. The palace was reconstructed based on written materials, fragments and drawings.

    The precious wall decoration of the Mirror Cabinet with the reverse glass painting created in 1740-1745 was almost completely destroyed in 1945. Only the furniture, the chandeliers and two door wings had been stored beforehand in a safe place. Since the glass plates had been plastered directly onto the wall, the first one had broken when an attempt was made to remove it. The reconstruction was based primarily on this original fragment, an extremely detailed painting of the room by Georg Dehn and numerous color slides taken by Carl Lamb in 1944.

    From 1979-1987 it was thus possible to recreate the entire interior, imitating the old techniques. The stuccowork alone took 27,000 hours to complete, while the gilders spent 30,000 hours applying 2.5 kilos of gold leaf. The artist Wolfgang Lenz reconstructed the complex reverse glass painting.

    On 16 March 1945 Würzburg suffered the same fate as Rotterdam, Coventry, Hamburg or Dresden. Within 17 minutes, 225 Lancaster bombers of the Royal Air Force dropped about 400 tones of high-explosive bombs and more than 300,000 stick-type incendiary bombs. Würzburg was razed to the ground by a gigantic storm of fire; 90 per cent of the historic city center was destroyed, and at least 5000 people were killed. But this was not the end of the war. Before American Forces reached the banks of the River Main below Marienberg Fortress on 2 April, the German Armed Forces blew up all bridges and prepared to defend the ruins of the city. Only after heavy artillery fire and three days of fierce fighting, with numerous military and civilian casualties, were American troops able to capture the whole of Würzburg on 6 April 1945.

    Source: taken from the writing at the museum

    The reverse glass painting:

    Mirror Cabinet mirrors by Johann Michael Feuchtmeyer, closeup at the Würzburg Residence

    What is the reverse glass painting?

    The Reverse glass painting, also known as verre églomisé, is a traditional decorative art technique where a design is painted on the backside of a piece of glass or glass plates, typically using oil or acrylic paints. The term “reverse” comes from the fact that the painting is viewed through the glass from the front, which is the opposite of traditional painting on canvas or other surfaces. The technique allows for a unique luminosity and depth to the colors due to the transparency of the glass, creating a distinct visual effect. To create a reverse glass painting, the artist begins by tracing a design onto the back of a piece of glass. The design is then painted in reverse order, starting with the smallest and most detailed elements and working towards the background. Once the painting is complete, the glass is flipped over, varnished and framed so that the image can be viewed from the front.

    wurzburg palace
    Wurzburg Reference | A closeup of the reverse glass painting recreated in the Mirror Cabinet at the Residence.

    The history of reverse glass painting can be traced back to at least the 10th century in China. The earliest known examples of reverse glass paintings from China are religious icons, which were often used to decorate temples and shrines. Reverse glass painting was also popular in Europe during the Middle Ages and Renaissance. During this time, it was used to create religious stained glass windows, devotional panels, and mirrors. In the 17th and 18th centuries, reverse glass painting became increasingly popular as a folk art form. It was especially popular in Germany, Switzerland, and Poland, where it was used to create decorative objects for the home, such as clocks, picture frames, and furniture.

    #3 Artistic inspiration behind opulent rooms & gardens

    The Würzburg Residence reminded me of the Hermitage and the Catherine Palace with its Grand Staircase consisting of twisting figures and white staircase. Designed by the court architect-Neumann, the rooms have unique coloring of light, gentle hues and absolutely gorgeous stucco work. Paired with crystal chandeliers and frescoes, this palace stands at par with top palaces found in Europe.

    wurzburg palace 7-veronica winters art blog
    You can find White Hall statues by Johann Peter Wagner & the Tiepolo frescoes at the Residence.

    The Imperial Hall features stunning celestial frescoes by Giovanni Battista Tiepolo. The Court Chapel consists of Baroque-style columns, sculpture and art that seem to be transported from the St. Peter’s Basilica’s interior. Lavish, ethereal creations created by artist- Antonio Giuseppe Bossi- take a while to process because of its beautiful interplay of light and shadow, color and air.

    The Court Chapel at the Wurzburg Residence

    The 3-D floor design:

    Found in the Green Lacquered Room, the three-dimensional parquet design is a fascinating circular pattern of inlaid light and dark exotic woods. The floor was destroyed completely in the WWII and it took years to understand the pattern to reconstruct it out of 8 different kinds of woods. The floor design is similar to the Italian designs found in other European palaces.

    The Garden of the Residence

    Don’t forget to visit beautiful garden of the Residence by Balthasar Neumann designed during the reign of the Prince Bishop of Würzburg, Adam Friedrich von Seinsheim. Created by the Johann Prokop Mayer (1735-1804), the grounds are reminiscent of French design. It’s well-maintained and is a nice spot to take pictures.

    Würzburg Residence tickets and parking: There is a large parking lot available in front of the Residence. Plus street parking is easy too. I visited the palace in early September 2023 and it wasn’t crowded at all. The single adult ticket was under $10 and they give great discounts to children, students, etc. They don’t allow any kind of bag/backpack inside the palace and so you need to have one euro to use their free locker. The administration also offers Würzburg Residence tours.

    Official website of the palace: https://www.residenz-wuerzburg.de/englisch/residenz/index.htm

    Address: Residenzpl. 2, 97070 Würzburg, Germany

    Photo credit:

    All photos are taken by Veronica Winters posted with permission of the Bavarian Palace Administration. No copying or re-print is allowed without a written permission from both parties. Courtesy of the Bavarian Palace Administration www.schloesser.bayern.de

    Shop visionary art for sale

    https://veronicasart.com/shop/



    Source link